Latest Posts

Stay in Touch With Us

Got a story worth telling? Send it our way. We read every tip that lands in our inbox.

Livebriefs

  /  All News   /  The Downfall of Apollo’s Commercial Lending REIT

The Downfall of Apollo’s Commercial Lending REIT

12 hr 2 min agoJun. 16, 2026 3:49 pm

Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance announced its dissolution this week, a stunning reversal for a REIT that reported positive net income just two years ago. The company sold its $9 billion loan portfolio to sister company Athene Holding in January, exited active lending, and is now liquidating its remaining assets. What makes the collapse notable is how quickly loan losses pulled the company under. Apollo didn’t blow up on a broad market downturn or systemic shock. It failed on concentrated bets that deteriorated more severely than management anticipated.

In 2023, Apollo CREF reported net income of $0.29 per share. In 2024, the company reported a net loss of $132 million, or $0.97 per share. That swing reflects specific loan positions that went from performing to troubled during 2024. The most visible loss was the $82 million write-off on 111 West 57th Street, the Billionaires’ Row development where Apollo had provided a junior mezzanine loan. When the project encountered complications and asset values declined, Apollo took the full loss rather than hoping for recovery. It was not an isolated position. Apollo’s 2024 financial statements show significant credit loss allowances and realized losses on investments throughout the year. The company’s core lending business generated revenue, but the accumulated losses on specific positions overwhelmed operating profits.

Apollo’s interest income from commercial mortgage loans was approximately $543 million through the first nine months of 2024, a respectable level that demonstrated the underlying business could generate returns. But interest expense exceeded available revenue, and credit losses from specific loans eroded what remained. The company had been originating new loans even as losses mounted, suggesting management initially believed the issues were contained rather than indicative of broader portfolio stress. The company committed $1.9 billion to new loans in 2024 even as it was writing down legacy positions. That continued deployment into a deteriorating market, even as existing loans were requiring major reserves, raises questions about how management was evaluating credit conditions.

The Massachusetts healthcare loan illustrated this pattern. Apollo had co-originated a $378.7 million first mortgage loan secured by eight hospitals in Massachusetts. The project ran into payment difficulties, and Apollo’s ownership stake in the underlying real estate entity became entangled in litigation with the state. By mid-2025, Apollo settled its claims for $18 million related to the troubled transaction. These kinds of complex capital structures made sense during the ultra-low rate environment when risk seemed manageable and development timelines appeared reasonable. In a higher-rate environment with deteriorating property values, extended development timelines, and increased uncertainty, those same structures became liabilities.

The decision to liquidate rather than continue managing the portfolio reflects management’s assessment that the cost of maintaining a public lending REIT exceeded the value it could generate. Apollo had no corporate debt maturities until May 2026, so the dissolution wasn’t forced by financing pressure. Instead, it appears to be a strategic conclusion that the combined effect of concentrated losses, difficult market conditions, and the operational burden of managing a public REIT made liquidation preferable to continued operations. The company retained approximately $2.2 billion in cash after the portfolio sale and can distribute that to shareholders or hold it pending a strategic alternative.

Lending REITs like Apollo that became highly concentrated in specific property types or geographic markets are now facing severe pressure. This is exacerbated by the shift of lending capital from REITs to insurance companies as specialized lenders are not able to manage the credit deterioration they’re facing. Insurance companies, which provide significantly more capital flexibility and can absorb losses over longer timeframes, are becoming the primary capital provider to commercial real estate. Apollo’s exit marks one of the larger casualties of this transition.

The post The Downfall of Apollo’s Commercial Lending REIT appeared first on Propmodo.

​  

You don't have permission to register