Latest Posts

Stay in Touch With Us

Got a story worth telling? Send it our way. We read every tip that lands in our inbox.

Livebriefs

  /  All News   /  News & Views Podcast: Stablecoins Are Solving a Bigger Problem Than Crypto Ever Did

News & Views Podcast: Stablecoins Are Solving a Bigger Problem Than Crypto Ever Did

  

Stablecoins are no longer just a crypto trading tool—in markets like Turkey, they are becoming a practical financial lifeline. In this conversation with Vugar Usi, CEO of MEXC, we explore why stablecoin adoption in Turkey is rising so quickly, how inflation and foreign exchange pressure are shaping demand, and what regulation could mean for the future of crypto payments.


If you have been wondering why US dollar-pegged stablecoins are gaining traction outside the usual crypto crowd, this post breaks down the real-world reasons. We also look at how tokenization is blending with traditional finance, why overtaxation can backfire, and where mainstream stablecoin payments may be headed next.

Why Stablecoin Adoption in Turkey Is Growing

Stablecoins are often described as a crypto asset, but in practice they are solving a much more immediate problem: access to stable value. In Turkey, that need has become especially urgent. Vugar explains that the current wave of adoption is less about speculation and more about utility. People are not necessarily using stablecoins because they want to be early on a new investment theme. They are using them because they need a faster, cheaper alternative to an unstable local currency and an expensive banking system.

“It is a problem versus solution… stablecoins allowed people to actually hold their holdings in US dollars and still do their spendings.”

That distinction matters. In high-inflation environments, a stablecoin becomes more than a digital asset—it becomes a store of value, a payment rail, and a way to preserve purchasing power. For users in Turkey, especially during periods of rapid currency devaluation, holding dollars in digital form can feel safer than keeping money in local currency. The same logic applies in other markets where foreign exchange access is limited or expensive, including parts of Central Asia.

The Real Use Case: Saving, Spending, and Beating FX Friction

A lot of people assume stablecoins are mainly used for day-to-day retail purchases, like buying coffee or paying for groceries. In reality, the more common use case in Turkey has been different: saving in stable value and converting when needed. That is partly because local rules limit what merchants can accept. Vugar notes that legally, transactions outside the Turkish lira were not generally allowed in the formal ecosystem. So while some businesses experimented with crypto acceptance, the bigger behavior was users moving value into stablecoins, holding it, and then converting back when necessary. This matters because it shows how stablecoins can create value even when they are not used as a universal checkout currency. They help people:

  • preserve savings during inflationary periods
  • avoid poor foreign exchange rates
  • access US dollar value when local banks cannot meet demand
  • move money faster than traditional rails

In Turkey, the demand has been so strong that an unofficial market rate for USDT has sometimes emerged—in some cases making one USDT worth more than a paper US dollar. That is a strong signal that the market sees real utility in digital dollars. Vugar also points out that this trend is not limited to Turkey. Similar dynamics have appeared in places where people face controls on foreign currency access or unreliable local money. The common thread is simple: when traditional finance becomes slow, expensive, or restrictive, stablecoins become attractive.

 

Regulation and Taxation: Why Clarity Helps, But Heavy Handedness Hurts

Once stablecoin usage grows, governments usually respond with regulation. That is already happening in Turkey, where lawmakers have been discussing tax frameworks, withholding taxes, and service-level charges on regulated platforms. Vugar believes regulation is necessary, but warns that over taxation can push activity underground. In a market where many people are using crypto to protect purchasing power, a very high tax burden could backfire by driving users toward decentralized and harder-to-track alternatives. He puts it clearly:

“Taxation is really important for the government and clarity is very important. But also over taxation… could push a shade economy.”

That is the core tension for regulators. They want visibility, tax revenue, and control over illicit flows. But if the rules become too punitive, they may end up reducing the very transparency they are trying to create. Turkey’s situation is particularly delicate because the market is already large. Vugar references estimates of around $200 billion in crypto transaction volume. If that volume is genuinely active and economically meaningful, then policy choices matter a great deal. A few key risks stand out:

  1. Too much tax can reduce participation

    Larger players may move elsewhere, while smaller users bear the biggest burden.

  2. Heavy rules can encourage shadow markets

    People may simply shift activity to wallets and decentralized systems.

  3. Regulation without practical alternatives can hurt the economy

    If users have nowhere efficient to go, they may resort to informal workarounds.

The best outcome, according to Vugar, is not a crackdown. It is a framework that allows legitimate activity to stay visible and useful. That means rules that support innovation, enable tracking, and let the government collect revenue without crushing everyday users.

Crypto and Traditional Finance Are Converging Fast

One of the most interesting themes in the conversation is that crypto exchanges are no longer just crypto exchanges. They are becoming broader financial platforms. Vugar describes MEXC’s move into real stocks, tokenized assets, and easier access to traditional investment products. The idea is simple: users want everything in one place. If they can hold stablecoins, trade crypto, buy US equities, and access other financial products from a single app, the whole experience becomes faster and cheaper. This is not just a crypto trend. Traditional fintech apps are moving the same way. Apps like Revolut, Monzo, and Robinhood already blur the line between banking, investing, and crypto. The broader industry seems to be moving toward a “single trade everything platform” or a kind of super app for finance. Why does that matter? Because for users, it means:

  • fewer platform switches
  • lower friction between asset classes
  • faster decision-making
  • better access for people outside the US or other major financial hubs

And for businesses, it improves economics. Vugar points out that onboarding users in finance is expensive. KYC, compliance, and acquisition costs can easily run $10 to $15 per user before any revenue is generated. Offering more services increases lifetime value and gives the platform more ways to monetize over time. That is why the line between crypto and traditional finance is fading. The winners will likely be the platforms that make money movement feel simple, not the ones that cling to one asset category. 

Will Stablecoins Become Mainstream for Payments?

This is the big question: when do stablecoins move from niche utility to everyday consumer payments ?Vugar is optimistic, but he is also pragmatic. He believes mainstream adoption is coming, but only if the user actually benefits. If a big card network or payment giant adopts blockchain rails but keeps fees the same, the technology may improve behind the scenes without changing the customer experience. That is the key test. Stablecoins will matter most when they do at least one of these things:

  • reduce fees
  • speed up settlement
  • improve transparency
  • simplify cross-border payments
  • unlock better cash flow for businesses

He argues that the real breakthrough may not come from a card network alone, but from large native players or major institutions tokenizing assets and settlement flows. Names like Fidelity and BlackRock came up in the discussion as examples of how institutional participation could reshape the market. The strongest case, though, may be business-to-business payments. Today, many global transactions settle on 30, 60, or 90-day credit terms. That creates huge working capital pressure, especially for small and mid-sized businesses. If stablecoins can shorten settlement time dramatically, they could free up cash flow and help smaller companies grow faster. That is where the macro impact becomes interesting. Stablecoins are not just about moving money across borders. They are about making money move faster inside the global economy.

What This Means for the Future of Digital Money

The big lesson from Turkey is that stablecoin adoption is rarely about hype first. It is usually about need. People adopt stablecoins when they need protection from inflation, easier access to foreign currency, or a faster way to move value. At the same time, the Turkish example shows why regulation has to be carefully designed. Governments need clarity and tax revenue, but if they overreach, they may push users into the parts of crypto that are harder to monitor and even harder to regulate. The future likely belongs to platforms and payment systems that can combine the best of both worlds:

  • the speed and efficiency of crypto rails
  • the familiarity and trust of traditional finance
  • the flexibility of tokenized assets
  • the transparency needed by regulators

That is why stablecoins are becoming such an important part of the wider financial conversation. They are not replacing every payment system overnight. But in markets where money is unstable, expensive to move, or hard to access, they are already changing behavior.


Frequently Asked Questions

Why are stablecoins so popular in Turkey? Stablecoins are popular in Turkey because they offer a way to hold value in US dollars when the local currency is volatile. They also help users avoid poor exchange rates and move money more efficiently than traditional banking systems. Are stablecoins used for everyday payments in Turkey? Sometimes, but more often they are used as a savings and conversion tool. In many cases, users hold stablecoins and convert them when needed rather than spending them directly at retail merchants. How could regulation affect stablecoin adoption? Clear regulation can help the market grow by making activity safer and more transparent. But excessive taxes or restrictions may push users into decentralized channels or offshore alternatives. Will stablecoins replace traditional payment systems? Not completely. The more likely outcome is that stablecoins become part of a hybrid financial system where traditional finance and digital assets work side by side. What is the biggest benefit of stablecoins for businesses? The biggest benefit is faster settlement. Stablecoins can reduce the time it takes for money to move, which improves cash flow and gives businesses more flexibility.

 


Stablecoin adoption in Turkey is being driven by inflation, foreign exchange friction, and the need for faster, cheaper money movement—and the bigger story is how digital assets and traditional finance are rapidly converging.

The post News & Views Podcast: Stablecoins Are Solving a Bigger Problem Than Crypto Ever Did appeared first on The Fintech Times.

  

You don't have permission to register